How to Choose the Right Materials for 3D-Printed Lab Tools

How to Choose the Right Materials for 3D-Printed Lab Tools
Posted on May 4th, 2025 

 

Have you ever found yourself in the lab, facing a peculiar challenge that the readily available tools just couldn't solve? It’s a common scenario in many labs—wishing for a tool that fits perfectly into your unique workflow but just isn’t available on the market. That’s where the beauty of 3D printing steps in, turning those elusive wishes into tangible realities. Imagine seamlessly creating bespoke holders, adapters, or even organizers tailored specifically to your needs, bypassing lengthy wait times and cumbersome supply chains. Through this tech, you aren’t just fabricating items; you’re reshaping how efficient your daily operational routine can be. Suddenly, creating those hard-to-find solutions becomes an integral part of your day rather than a far-off ideal. 


As we delve into the viable choices of 3D printing materials, clarity around just what benefits each one brings is essential. Not every material fits every scenario, a fact you start to learn through a bit of trial, error, and maybe a few melted prototypes. Among the crowd of options like PLA, ABS, and TPU, your choice hinges on the style of project on hand, the required durability, and other vital factors like temperature resistance. Remember those projects where we thought we nailed it, only to find a slight oversight meant starting over? Well, every miss tells a meaningful story of refinement, leading to a keener eye for the differences that really matter. Considering these aspects ensures that you’re enhancing not only function but also the safety and sustainability of the tools you're creating. 


Beyond functionality, intertwining elements like ergonomics and visual appeal with the quality of craftsmanship offers the chance to tailor each tool not just for performance but for practical ease and workflow enhancement. Observing how a user-friendly design cuts down on fiddling and frustration over prolonged tasks highlights just why those subtle details matter. Think about how you interact with the tools daily—should they offer a lighter grip, withstand sterilization, or room for quick modifications? This isn’t only about aesthetics, though they undeniably play a part in creating an engaging workspace. It’s about realizing the role each tool plays in the broader picture of your day's efficiency, comfort, and productivity. Making these choices isn't just a technical exercise; it's about reshaping comfort and practicality in every loophole you close and spare moment you save. 


 

Understanding the Landscape of 3D Printing in Labs 

The advent of 3D printing has truly expanded what we can do in lab settings. The process has evolved from being a mere prototyping tool to becoming a crucial part of how lab tools are made, particularly for diagnostics. Think about how 3D printing for lab tools allows you to rapidly prototype custom diagnostic components that otherwise would take weeks to adjust through traditional manufacturing. Now, you can iterate on functional prototypes in hours rather than weeks, saving both time and resources. Moreover, this tech is not confined to making standard lab tools but has an impact on unconventional diagnostics setups, helping you adapt swiftly to emerging needs without needing to fall back on cumbersome supply chains. I remember early on in my lab days, we needed a specific holder for samples but couldn't find one that fit our exact needs. That's when we turned to 3D printing and radically improved our workflow by creating a holder customized to our peculiar requirements. 


3D printing for diagnostics is just the beginning as the range of materials available keeps growing. Each material brings its unique properties to the table—it's about what best serves your specific diagnostic or lab printing needs. For instance, PLA is awesome for simple, non-load-bearing parts due to its ease of use and good dimensional accuracy. When a tool requires a bit more durability, ABS might step in as a versatile option that also withstands higher temperatures. Then there’s the flexible TPU, which bends and doesn't break, great for parts that need to endure some flexing without snapping. Through trial and error in different projects, I've faced my share of flops, like when I chose the wrong material and ended up with a part that melted in an autoclave. Each attempt brings newfound understanding that informs your next choice and ensures your lab has what it needs to perform optimally. 


Besides understanding each material's properties, ergonomics play a crucial role in selecting the best material for 3D lab printing. It's not enough to simply create a tool; it should be user-friendly and ideally make daily workflows smoother. You have to consider how these tools will be used: Will they frequently be handled? Should they be sterilizable? On a few occasions, I've had to rethink a tool’s design because it wasn’t ergonomic with the first material choice, leading to cumbersome usage. Switching to a lighter or more nuanced material can make all the difference. And don’t overlook the aesthetics. This might sound minor, but having a visually appealing tool in a high-pressure lab environment can boost morale and productivity, believe it or not. Addressing these aspects means you’re not just making tools—you’re enhancing the lab experience on multiple fronts, benefiting everyone who steps into that space. 


 

Navigating the Sea of 3D Printing Materials 

Similarly, a careful choice of material can lead to innovations that affect health and safety standards in your lab. Using biocompatible 3D printing materials is essential, particularly when the tools will come into contact with biological samples. These materials need to withstand not just the physical pressures but also be free from harmful chemicals that might contaminate samples. Specialty resins, for example, are great when you need parts that must not only be precise but also safe for cellular work. I remember a project where we needed a pipette holder that came into contact with highly sensitive samples. Choosing a biocompatible resin ensured we didn’t compromise the integrity of our experiments. Small choices like these make the difference between a working prototype and a genuinely adoptable tool in a regulated lab setting. 


Another aspect to consider is adopting 3D printing for maintaining or improving the sustainability of your lab environment. Though it's not about simply swapping out materials, you can make a difference by considering the entire lifecycle of the 3D printed object. Can it be recycled or repurposed? Polylactic Acid (PLA), made from corn starch, for instance, is biodegradable and can play a role in reducing plastic waste. But don’t be fooled by its green credentials if it doesn’t meet the functional requirements of your project! Balancing sustainability without sacrificing functionality is where your discernment comes into play. Sharing tips on how your lab has become more eco-friendly by integrating specific 3D printing materials can also inspire good practices in the community. Over time, exploring such options contributes not just to the integrity of your research but aligns with broader environmental goals. 


Lastly, when choosing materials for 3D printing lab tools, consider the cost-effectiveness versus the benefit each material provides. Sure, some advanced polymers and resins come at a high price tag, but they might solve several issues that cheaper materials cannot, thereby potentially saving costs down the line. For instance, investing in higher-grade, heat-resistant polymers might seem steep initially, but if it results in more durable and robust diagnostics tools that need less frequent replacement, the long-term benefits are obvious. Personally, when I've chosen a more costly material that offered superior durability and eased customization, the elevated initial investment was clearly justified when looking at the broader picture. So, reflect on your bespoke requirements, the longevity you're aiming for, and the financial envelope allocated. Choosing wisely comes down not only to understanding the unique capabilities of each 3D printing material but also projecting how these capabilities fit into your lab’s evolving needs. 


 

Strategic Design and Process Considerations 

Strategically putting a 3D printing design process in place calls for a meticulous approach that weighs each decision, from initial design to the final print. One significant aspect to consider is layer resolution. It influences not only the texture but also the strength of the finished product. For example, a higher layer resolution results in smoother surfaces and more fine-tuned details, enhancing intricate designs like custom pipette tips. However, this may extend print times, which brings the classic quality versus efficiency debate into play. I recall a project where altering the layer resolution turned a fragile test-tube holder into a sturdy piece with a remarkable lifespan. Such design adjustments compel you to align technical characteristics with day-to-day lab priorities. Complement this with firsthand experience, and you can craft designs that truly meet the grueling demands of a lab environment. 


One cannot ignore the intricacies of tool design within 3D printing applications for your lab gadgets. Effective 3D printing design strategies often incorporate specific geometric adjustments, which might relax overhang angles to minimize the need for support materials, saving both cost and time. Every piece should be modeled considering how it prints—avoiding sharp corners and designing in accordance with the properties of the material used can improve the overall utility without unnecessary complexity. Post-processing methods like sanding and chemical smoothing play critical roles in creating functional, polished items. Experiences from my projects have taught me to trim unnecessary processing while retaining the intended fit and finish, a balance that's crucial to achieve efficient and consistent 3D printing solutions. Understanding when economic decisions trump aesthetic ones, or vice versa, becomes a significant skill as you optimize designs for real-world lab scenarios. 


Optimizing the 3D printing process inherently involves iterating and learning from real situations. Often, collaborating with your team to review each printed piece helps in identifying potential improvements more quickly. In one of our labs, we pivoted from a brittle initial design to a more reinforced structure simply by changing our infill pattern and tweaking wall thickness. Moreover, post-print modifications such as annealing—or stress-relieving—parts in an oven can also be pivotal, especially when dealing with materials like ABS or PLA that benefit from this method. These minor post-processing tweaks can greatly extend the life cycle and durability of your lab tools. Engaging with these nuances not only enhances your final product but also equips you with valuable insights that can be shared with others, fostering a culture of continuous improvement and technical evolution within your lab. 

Ultimately, selecting the right 3D printing material isn't a task to rush through—it's tailoring the perfect fit for your lab’s unique demands. It’s about establishing ease in meeting those demands, fostering efficient routines, and propelling innovation in diagnostics. With practice, you can gain a real knack for matching materials to specific applications, solving complex problems with custom-tailored, practical solutions. Whether your lab needs intricate pipetting solutions, durable test-tube racks, or versatile sample holders, each choice contributes to a toolkit that’s as adaptable as it is effective. Remember, the exploration process is iterative and this learning helps you design tools that fit snugly in real-world lab settings, letting you focus on what really matters—getting precise results without cumbersome delays. 


And it's not just about the technical and ergonomic advantages. Envision the practical benefits of turning ideas into functional, aesthetic reality with ease. By integrating your team’s feedback into the fine-tuning of each material’s application, you can bring a shared vision to life, piece by piece. Discussing sustainability in your process echoes wider initiatives within the scientific community, encouraging greener, more conscientious paths that align with broader environmental objectives. Practice and foresight in this area garner respect and trust within your team, laying the groundwork for a culture of continuous improvement and smart decision-making. 


If you’re considering how to best incorporate 3D printed lab tools or refine your existing processes, you're not alone in this journey. Orkyd Innovations, based in Lake Forest, California, is here to guide you with expert 3D printing solutions. We offer a range of tailored 3D-printed lab tools designed with your specific needs in mind. Whether you're ironing out the kinks in current diagnostics equipment or seeking more efficient solutions, our expertise covers cost-effective and innovative development. Reach out to us at [email protected] or give us a call at (949)678-9384. Let us craft the tools that enhance your lab’s productivity, safety, and ingenuity.

Solutions by Scientists, Not Salesmen

At Orkyd Innovations, we’re not just a 3D printing company — we’re lab problem-solvers.


Based in Lake Forest and serving the surrounding areas, we combine years of real-world experience in diagnostic lab R&D with cutting-edge 3D printing expertise.


Our mission? To help labs work smarter, faster, and more comfortably with affordable, reliable, and custom-built tools.


We know firsthand the daily challenges inside diagnostic labs — and we’re here to fix them with better designs, smarter solutions, and a serious passion for helping the people behind the assays.